The most typical texts of my discipline are textbooks. There
are many mathematical trade books out there, but for the most part it doesn’t
seem like books would be interesting if they were about math things, so those
books don’t get read as often as they should. This comes I’m sure, from math
textbooks being the only mathematical
books people are exposed to. I sadly was until within the last couple years one
of those who doubted the possibility of interesting math books.
My first experience really ever reading a math book came in
Calculus 3 when I needed extra explanations, and realized that I could actually
read my textbook. This was a “light-bulb moment” for me, because I’d never even
attempted to read a math book before. When I took Algebraic Structures, my math
book even had voice and a little bit of humor in it! Discovering the humor and
voice in that textbook was probably the most pleasurable moment of reading in
math. I still haven’t read any mathematical trade books yet, but am currently
in possession of one that I am about to start (Zero: The Biography of a
Dangerous Idea).
My most unpleasant moment in trying to read math books was
probably when attempting to read the book for my Linear Algebra and
Differential Equations book. I did not find that book at all friendly and
quickly gave up trying to read it as a way to get additional help. I did not
really always understand it, and it was really really dry. I can read most anything if it is written in such a way
that I can feel a person is expressing opinions, but books that have absolutely
no voice, and seem as though they could have been written by a very boring
robot I have a hard time with.
My best idea thus far for encouraging reading in my
discipline is to maybe take a little bit of time to read to my class a little
bit from a math trade book that I find engaging, to show them that they really can
be interesting. I am thinking that I may want to require my students to read
one math trade book during the semester. If I do this, very early on I would
want to read to them a bit, so they can see that what I am asking is really not
such a terrible thing, but may actually be quite enjoyable.
In my own math classes, the way I was generally encouraged
to express my understanding was just by solving math problems. As a teacher, I
am thinking that while being able to solve the problems is important, I can
encourage my students both in writing and comprehension if I have them
routinely writing about the meaning of the problems they are being asked to
solve, and about problems they may discover. This will help them both in
improving their literacy as well as helping them reach a much deeper learning
level in terms of the math. Likewise with assessments, if I have them writing
and explaining with their assignments, I can incorporate this writing and explaining
into their tests. In addition to their own learning being greater with this, it
will allow me, as their teacher, to better see their thought process, to see what
they really grasp and what they do not comprehend. One thought I have been
having about testing is that it might be interesting to give them the solution
to a couple of the problems and have them just explain to me how to get that
answer.I definitely want my students to learn that math is about so much more than plugging away, mindlessly, at algorithms, coming up with answers that they do not understand.
It’s interesting to see how our conceptions of discipline specific reading and writing inform the ways we learn in our disciplines, assess that knowledge and ultimately convey and value what our students are doing in regard to their own learning. You have some good ideas on how you will support your own students’ development in your discipline and I hope you continue to use this as a foundation to your future thinking about the literacy demands of your own discipline and how you can build those for your students.
ReplyDelete